Scientific expertise
Scientific expertise can be considered an important contributor to good governance,
especially in terms of providing information to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness
of the decision making process during epidemics and total pandemics.
The report of the HEG Expert Group on science, H1N1 and Society stresses on the
difference between good science and good expertise (where scientific expertise should
mix both). According to the report “Science is about questioning, doubting, addressing
and testing all alternatives at the same time in order to challenge them, whatever their
likelihood. Expertise and decision-making concern putting facts and evidence in order,
and ranking the likelyhood of various risk scenarios while taking into consideration the
contextual information. [..] Good expertise can also come from non-scientific
professionals and citizens.”
A problem during the H1N1 pandemic, identified in the report, was that after the initial
dominance of scientific expertise coming from microbiology, epidemiology and
medicine, when decisions were made on worldwide actions, the scientific input into
decisions became much less visible and systematic. Decisions on hygiene
measurements, vaccination campaigns, mobilization of facilities and communication
initiatives were generally taken without utilizing the knowledge and expertise of social
sciences, economics and systems and organization sciences and communication
sciences. The expert group insisted on the need for multidisciplinary scientific expertise
in crisis situations.(1)
(1) HEG Expert Group, Science, H1N1 and Society: Towards a more pandemicresilient
society, HEG Expert Group, June 2011